PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-17.02%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
48.39%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PANW's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
124.26%
SBC growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
144.23%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
403.45%
AR growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.82%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-119.04%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
8.88%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
18.08%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PANW's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
4.10%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-109.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
56.70%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-479.63%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.19%
Issuance growth of 161.19% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
27.64%
Buyback growth of 27.64% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.