PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.59%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
21.92%
D&A growth well above PANW's 0.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
289.75%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-26.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1010.55%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
149.41%
AR growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1135.03%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1826.51%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
257.05%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.41%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PANW's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
67.20%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
20.27%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PANW's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-9.36%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
134.12%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
126.10%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.38%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.