PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
86.40%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.80%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
1295.65%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.48%
SBC growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-183.70%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-201.49%
AR is negative yoy while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.26%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-754.77%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
13.56%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PANW's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-61.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
59.13%
Purchases well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-46.16%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.33%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-27.34%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-61.29%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-151.10%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.