PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.63%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -677.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.05%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 12.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
601.49%
Well above PANW's 650.75% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.01%
Negative yoy SBC while PANW is 68.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-17.51%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 246.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-280.76%
AR is negative yoy while PANW is 53.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
626.00%
Inventory growth well above PANW's 171.34%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
406.14%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -120.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
56.17%
Growth well above PANW's 1.53%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
59.93%
Some yoy increase while PANW is negative at -677.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.98%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 75.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.96%
CapEx growth well above PANW's 22.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-526.19%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
50.09%
Purchases growth of 50.09% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-27.47%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-209.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
61.91%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 22.14%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-249.86%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 97.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.