PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1007.72%
Net income growth above 1.5x PANW's 23.57%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-10.92%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 5.77%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-94.35%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
15.96%
SBC growth well above PANW's 27.70%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
22.45%
Well above PANW's 4.33% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
222.95%
AR growth while PANW is negative at -56.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-279.85%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -76.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-262.46%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 182.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-53.23%
Negative yoy usage while PANW is 28.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-171.12%
Negative yoy while PANW is 106.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
10.51%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 22.16%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
3.05%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -22.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-117.68%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-68.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
64.85%
Liquidation growth of 64.85% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -1056.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-65.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -5152.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.50%
We slightly raise equity while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-58.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -26.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.