PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x PANW's 25.66%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
42.11%
D&A growth well above PANW's 17.63%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
268.42%
Deferred tax of 268.42% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 60.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-172.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -13.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
93.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PANW's 846.51%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
220.81%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -40.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
68.91%
Growth well above PANW's 12.91%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-17.17%
Negative yoy while PANW is 26.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.66%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 49.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-54.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -54.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
72.84%
Acquisition growth of 72.84% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
49.98%
Purchases well above PANW's 50.05%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-37.42%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1.50%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PANW's 141.93%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
66.41%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 88.56%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.23%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-1.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -10083.33%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.