PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.62%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 50.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 17.78%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
195.51%
Deferred tax of 195.51% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.66%
SBC growth well above PANW's 2.04%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -38.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
216.78%
AR growth while PANW is negative at -198.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-456.68%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -67.21%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-156.79%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -108.26%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-67.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -0.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
10.90%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PANW's 105.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
39.00%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -6.83%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
31.38%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -168.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
25.00%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -83.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
45.35%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -252.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.98%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -48.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-179.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while PANW is 83.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
20.98%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -308.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.71%
Debt repayment growth of 25.71% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
22.29%
Issuance growth of 22.29% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-109.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -14.29%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.