PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.14%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -43.04%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.51%
D&A growth well above PANW's 11.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
4.32%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -125.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.01%
Negative yoy SBC while PANW is 47.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-38.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -7.13%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-150.97%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -198.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
321.53%
Some inventory rise while PANW is negative at -439.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
120.79%
AP growth well above PANW's 157.47%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
40.20%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 132.94%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-5.46%
Negative yoy while PANW is 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-48.05%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-16.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -2.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1881.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
20.42%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -36.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
1.98%
Below 50% of PANW's 12.41%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
164.85%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -4619.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.05%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -42.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-219.87%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-43.98%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
25.73%
Buyback growth of 25.73% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.