PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.87%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 9.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
19.27%
D&A growth well above PANW's 5.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-4013.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 80.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.10%
SBC growth well above PANW's 10.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-25.63%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -6.42%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-137.79%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -1895.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
230.57%
Some inventory rise while PANW is negative at -79.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
122.35%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -188.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
24.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 52.25%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-8.19%
Negative yoy while PANW is 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-45.51%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.09%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -113.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-103066.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
18.20%
Purchases well above PANW's 3.05%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
40.80%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -36.87%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
1373.81%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -514.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.14%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -143.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1730.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-45.64%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.49%
We have some buyback growth while PANW is negative at -140.20%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.