PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.66%
Net income growth similar to PANW's 37.27%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-4.48%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 10.60%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-150.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 2971.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.40%
SBC growth well above PANW's 1.29%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
5.93%
Slight usage while PANW is negative at -13.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-562.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -403.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-1143.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -11250.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
300.00%
AP growth well above PANW's 19.23%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
47.16%
Growth well above PANW's 86.57%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-7.95%
Negative yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.24%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 13.40%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-34.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -1.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
55.36%
Acquisition growth of 55.36% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
33.90%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -63.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-40.91%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 87.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
90.46%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PANW's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-19.03%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 63.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1496.21%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
23.46%
Issuance growth of 23.46% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
14.40%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x PANW's 7.28%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.