PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-195.83%
Negative net income growth while PANW stands at 45.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.48%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 3.76%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
25890.57%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -80.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
1.34%
Less SBC growth vs. PANW's 4.06%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-178.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -30.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-149.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -117.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
217.79%
Some inventory rise while PANW is negative at -179.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
330.47%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -352.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
84.09%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 256.04%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-30.78%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -64.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.70%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -11.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.29%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 20.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
84.92%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-36.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 35.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
68.47%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -34.56%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-266.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while PANW is 67.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
95.21%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 31.11%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-184.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-38.44%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
21.87%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x PANW's 6.79%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.