PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
217.80%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -33.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.86%
D&A growth well above PANW's 11.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-98.18%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.72%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -10.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
153.09%
Slight usage while PANW is negative at -1.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
132.88%
AR growth well above PANW's 138.46%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-106.22%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 10.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-141.90%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 116.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
174.34%
Some yoy usage while PANW is negative at -21.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
35.96%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PANW's 301.30%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.30%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -0.98%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-13.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -12.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-818.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
40.46%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PANW's 89.43%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-28.74%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 39.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
89.27%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -3424.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1261.33%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -523.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-46.77%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
32.80%
Issuance growth of 32.80% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-88.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 90.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.