PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.52%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 95.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-7.16%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 15.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-696.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.44%
SBC growth well above PANW's 6.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.50%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-815.02%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -2018.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-662.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -148.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
357.00%
AP growth well above PANW's 361.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
2238.10%
Growth well above PANW's 108.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-29.45%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -68.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.03%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 15.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-35.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 11.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-75.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 98.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-20.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -2093.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
0.60%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -15.01%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
57.89%
Growth well above PANW's 52.18%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-169.46%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 8.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
86.05%
Debt repayment growth of 86.05% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.59%
Issuance growth of 1.59% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
37.53%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.