PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.58%
Negative net income growth while PANW stands at 93.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.57%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 19.38%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
82.29%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -120.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
6.87%
SBC growth well above PANW's 4.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-234.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -49.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -137.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
273.01%
Some inventory rise while PANW is negative at -738.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-11.39%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -1200.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
60.12%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 394.13%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
43.75%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PANW's 328.85%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-34.83%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 9.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-2.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 31.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-550.20%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 99.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
13.77%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -74.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-12.16%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 264.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
23.04%
Growth well above PANW's 4.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-42.23%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 26.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.44%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-71.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -2274.10%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.