PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.62%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -676.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.30%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
81.43%
Deferred tax of 81.43% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.93%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -2.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
122.61%
Well above PANW's 0.17% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
119.20%
AR growth well above PANW's 130.28%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-99.27%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 5.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
55.23%
Lower AP growth vs. PANW's 430.77%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
122.25%
Some yoy usage while PANW is negative at -49.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
29.63%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PANW's 92.38%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
51.91%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PANW's 7.63%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
30.81%
CapEx growth well above PANW's 13.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
83.11%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -227800.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
65.32%
Purchases well above PANW's 69.42%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-59.25%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -36.44%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
33.73%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PANW's 121.57%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
67.55%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 73.21%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to PANW's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
37.00%
Issuance growth of 37.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
25.88%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 98.91%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.