PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.03%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -186.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.61%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 28.91%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-83.45%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.05%
SBC growth while PANW is negative at -0.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
130.75%
Less working capital growth vs. PANW's 1675.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
200.20%
AR growth well above PANW's 148.64%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-396.46%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 52.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-143.28%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -127.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-165.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -95.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
103.42%
Well above PANW's 9.05%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-14.22%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -2.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.44%
CapEx growth well above PANW's 11.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-64.41%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 83.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-51.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 50.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
103.41%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PANW's 14.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
170.80%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PANW's 7719.15%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
75.53%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PANW's 154.49%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-150.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
38.64%
Issuance growth of 38.64% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-6.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -2203.49%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.