PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -1.49%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.65%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 12.18%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
206.68%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -14.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.15%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -1.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
135.21%
Slight usage while PANW is negative at -171.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.20%
AR growth while PANW is negative at -170.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-77.35%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 7.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
7900.00%
AP growth well above PANW's 62.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
104.88%
Some yoy usage while PANW is negative at -41.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
125.62%
Well above PANW's 12.37%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
63.90%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -44.64%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-6.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -75.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-311.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -199.92%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.31%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -35.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
20.83%
Similar to PANW's 21.99%. Walter Schloss finds parallel timing in investment disposals or maturities.
272.00%
Growth well above PANW's 21.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
100.84%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -37.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16566.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
46.15%
Issuance growth of 46.15% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-35.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -14825.37%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.