PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 21.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.38%
D&A growth well above PANW's 11.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-125.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. PANW's 5.07%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Less working capital growth vs. PANW's 156.04%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1149.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -234.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-238.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -136.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
454.21%
AP growth well above PANW's 281.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
13958.21%
Growth well above PANW's 333.14%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-251.92%
Negative yoy while PANW is 44.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.68%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 96.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 63.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-401.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 153.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -7156.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
9.95%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -67.21%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-129.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -127.80%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-8849.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -343.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-0.58%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.96%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 99.41%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.