PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.02%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -56.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-24.51%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PANW at -7.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
92.25%
Deferred tax of 92.25% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
7.93%
Less SBC growth vs. PANW's 18.14%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-47.87%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 617.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
194.53%
AR growth well above PANW's 203.77%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-221.91%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 39.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-89.59%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -277.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-172.94%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -99.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-62.03%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -8.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.55%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 60.29%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.44%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 6.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
70.85%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -208.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
22.77%
Purchases well above PANW's 6.28%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-24.36%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -20.56%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-67.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -203.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -32.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.29%
Issuance growth of 60.29% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-16.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -8374.58%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.