PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.30%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -54.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.39%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 11.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-54.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 18.52%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.55%
SBC growth well above PANW's 9.62%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-566.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -60.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-145.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -95.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
197.52%
Some inventory rise while PANW is negative at -54.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-89.52%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
45.91%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 13320.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-176.56%
Negative yoy while PANW is 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-35.27%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -31.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
14.94%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -8.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
13.72%
Some acquisitions while PANW is negative at -80.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-3.51%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 65.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
6.03%
Below 50% of PANW's 69.48%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
115.70%
Growth well above PANW's 108.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
68.93%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 56.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.59%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
3.08%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 98.86%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.