PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.48%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 17.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.90%
D&A growth well above PANW's 0.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.36%
Well above PANW's 18.18% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
3.02%
SBC growth while PANW is negative at -1.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-33.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 215.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-4102.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -386.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-17.93%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 178.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
94.12%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -156.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
538.20%
Growth well above PANW's 89.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-18.52%
Negative yoy while PANW is 14.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 17.28%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -1.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.33%
Acquisition spending well above PANW's 99.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
19.04%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -21.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.54%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 40.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
8.50%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PANW's 100.29%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-12.07%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 98.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
13.64%
Issuance growth of 13.64% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-3.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 6.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.