PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.59%
Net income growth above 1.5x PANW's 13.16%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-3.95%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-17458.82%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.34%
SBC growth well above PANW's 12.65%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
205.26%
Less working capital growth vs. PANW's 5686.67%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
190.35%
AR growth well above PANW's 190.44%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -189.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-129.13%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 347.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-131.10%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -128.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
12.50%
Some yoy increase while PANW is negative at -30.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
8.06%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 80.76%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
9.95%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -26.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-140.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -17300.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
30.71%
Purchases well above PANW's 5.53%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
37.46%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -46.67%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-196.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -178000.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
70.05%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -9479.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.00%
Issuance growth of 36.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-7.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 93.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.