PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.49%
Negative net income growth while PANW stands at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.84%
D&A growth well above PANW's 0.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
103.07%
Well above PANW's 2.78% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
11.46%
SBC growth well above PANW's 2.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-275.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -47.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-152.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -132.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
150.71%
Inventory growth well above PANW's 71.52%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
149.89%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -40.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-22.65%
Negative yoy usage while PANW is 358.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
15.66%
Well above PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-40.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -18.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-0.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -133.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
29.52%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. PANW's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
75.70%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -40.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-43.78%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 61.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
78.66%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -8.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
64.28%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -19.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-52.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
3.27%
We have some buyback growth while PANW is negative at -2650.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.