PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.07%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 104.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.46%
Some D&A expansion while PANW is negative at -58.23%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
242.93%
Deferred tax of 242.93% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.77%
SBC growth while PANW is negative at -3.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-52.05%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 128.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1574.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -212.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-65.23%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
411.35%
AP growth well above PANW's 315.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
485.36%
Growth well above PANW's 190.27%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
13722.86%
Well above PANW's 70.24%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 34.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -2.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.25%
Acquisition spending well above PANW's 75.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
43.61%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -304.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-74.92%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 74.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.64%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -608.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.84%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -1200.47%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.74%
We have some buyback growth while PANW is negative at -2956.25%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.