PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.87%
Net income growth under 50% of PANW's 506.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-29.88%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 102.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-520.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.76%
SBC growth well above PANW's 11.02%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
27.16%
Less working capital growth vs. PANW's 796.50%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
192.84%
AR growth well above PANW's 198.90%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-17.79%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-158.93%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -105.65%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-125.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -112.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-139.22%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -29.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.81%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 136.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.56%
Some CapEx rise while PANW is negative at -1.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
72.37%
Acquisition spending well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-1.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -116.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
110.06%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PANW's 48.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
24.43%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -209.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
67.81%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -179.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.73%
Issuance growth of 24.73% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
36.36%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 93.37%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.