PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.01%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -14.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.21%
Some D&A expansion while PANW is negative at -7.22%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
69.92%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -8326.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.77%
SBC growth well above PANW's 6.61%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-43.01%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 457.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
198.13%
AR growth well above PANW's 203.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-235.03%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 95.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-7.40%
Both negative yoy AP, with PANW at -101.07%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-167.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -110.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-68.18%
Negative yoy while PANW is 318.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PANW's 268.51%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-10.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-247.80%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 192.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
29.36%
Purchases well above PANW's 14.44%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
69.81%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -45.49%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-265.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -192.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
105.51%
We have mild expansions while PANW is negative at -135.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PANW is 97.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
33.79%
Issuance growth of 33.79% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
15.31%
We have some buyback growth while PANW is negative at -2200.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.