PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.89%
Negative net income growth while PANW stands at 799.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
51.98%
D&A growth well above PANW's 6.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-199.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 142.08%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.80%
SBC growth well above PANW's 0.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-525.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -79.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -145.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
391.88%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PANW's 1054.01%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-307.66%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 12025.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
32.42%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PANW's 394.99%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1314.29%
Some yoy increase while PANW is negative at -455.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-38.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -54.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PANW's 4.35%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-5383.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -1759.24%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
49.67%
Some yoy expansion while PANW is negative at -35.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-72.68%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -37.44%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
237.17%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -1747.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-14399.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -927.52%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-94.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -174.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-61.90%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.20%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 94.30%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.