PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.32%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -84.04%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.14%
Less D&A growth vs. PANW's 8.31%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
22.27%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -177.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-4.42%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -3.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
124.49%
Slight usage while PANW is negative at -138.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
31.28%
AR growth well above PANW's 60.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-82.36%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
125.70%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -242.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
157.79%
Some yoy usage while PANW is negative at -53.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
7943.43%
Well above PANW's 144.56%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
69.29%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -23.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-12.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -6.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.58%
Acquisition spending well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
48.73%
Purchases well above PANW's 58.93%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-7.98%
We reduce yoy sales while PANW is 31.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-195.10%
We reduce yoy other investing while PANW is 122.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
85.12%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 108.53%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-210.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -423.99%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-5.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -13057.89%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.