PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.94%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -1.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.72%
D&A growth well above PANW's 10.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-25.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PANW stands at 36.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.04%
SBC growth well above PANW's 9.45%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-88.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 920.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
205.97%
AR growth well above PANW's 209.53%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-778.18%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-121.79%
Negative yoy AP while PANW is 1660.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-173.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -162.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.51%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -3.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.11%
Negative yoy CFO while PANW is 194.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7.57%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-37.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while PANW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
42.78%
Purchases well above PANW's 38.02%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
14.64%
We have some liquidation growth while PANW is negative at -30.03%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-139.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -222.73%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
52.09%
We repay more while PANW is negative at -59.82%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
32.21%
We slightly raise equity while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
2.45%
Buyback growth below 50% of PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.