PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.27%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -23.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-7.53%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 4.41%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
19.19%
Some yoy growth while PANW is negative at -30.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.07%
SBC growth well above PANW's 8.90%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1449.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PANW at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-142.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PANW at -124.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
290.62%
Inventory growth of 290.62% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
204.59%
A yoy AP increase while PANW is negative at -165.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
39.10%
Growth well above PANW's 52.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
880.80%
Well above PANW's 628.26%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-34.78%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -63.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-5.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -7.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.01%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. PANW's 100.10%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-26.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -62.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
25.80%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x PANW's 11.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
98.25%
We have some outflow growth while PANW is negative at -7.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
7.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PANW's 29.97%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-63.74%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-21.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.