PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.12%
Net income growth under 50% of PLTR's 50.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
28.02%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-93.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.53%
Negative yoy SBC while PLTR is 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
117.68%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
58.83%
AR growth well above PLTR's 78.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-92.69%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.07%
AP growth well above PLTR's 15.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
145.18%
Growth well above PLTR's 134.63%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-130.53%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
66.18%
Operating cash flow growth similar to PLTR's 73.48%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-5.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -23.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
30.18%
Acquisition growth of 30.18% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-118.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 48.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
72.03%
We have some liquidation growth while PLTR is negative at -13.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3875.00%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -33.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
9.91%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PLTR's 55.62%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.28%
Issuance growth of 113.28% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.11%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.