PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.05%
Net income growth under 50% of PLTR's 50.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-26.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLTR at -1.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.20%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-294.64%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.42%
Growth well above PLTR's 134.63%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-0.79%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 73.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.44%
Some CapEx rise while PLTR is negative at -23.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 48.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.45%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -33.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.67%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 55.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.91%
Issuance growth of 65.91% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
78.26%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.