PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1873.85%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLTR's 50.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-50.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLTR at -1.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
52.79%
Deferred tax of 52.79% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.82%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PLTR is 259.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.82%
Negative yoy usage while PLTR is 134.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-51.20%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.31%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 73.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
53.42%
Some CapEx rise while PLTR is negative at -23.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.20%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PLTR's 48.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-12.73%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -13.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.42%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 55.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.52%
Negative yoy issuance while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
52.95%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.