PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.78%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 50.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.60%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-68.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.61%
SBC growth well above PLTR's 2.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
182.16%
Well above PLTR's 259.47% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.81%
AR growth well above PLTR's 78.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.43%
Negative yoy usage while PLTR is 134.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-119.24%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
55.07%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of PLTR's 73.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-9.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -23.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
68.13%
Acquisition growth of 68.13% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
44.89%
Purchases well above PLTR's 48.88%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-54.07%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -13.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
140.13%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -33.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.83%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PLTR's 55.62%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.52%
Negative yoy issuance while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
69.44%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.