PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLTR's 50.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.14%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLTR at -1.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
111.34%
Deferred tax of 111.34% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.06%
SBC growth well above PLTR's 2.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
3.28%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
217.03%
AR growth well above PLTR's 78.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-118.41%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4.93%
Lower AP growth vs. PLTR's 15.24%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-57.68%
Negative yoy usage while PLTR is 134.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-163.86%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.09%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PLTR's 73.48%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
23.86%
Some CapEx rise while PLTR is negative at -23.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
37.70%
Acquisition growth of 37.70% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-48.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 48.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.26%
We have some liquidation growth while PLTR is negative at -13.83%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
2166.67%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -33.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
0.02%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PLTR's 55.62%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
46.30%
Debt repayment growth of 46.30% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
45.03%
Issuance growth of 45.03% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-11.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -3.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.