PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.85%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 50.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.56%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
242.11%
Deferred tax of 242.11% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.13%
SBC growth well above PLTR's 2.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
51.99%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
173.38%
AR growth well above PLTR's 78.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-78.17%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-134.96%
Negative yoy AP while PLTR is 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
11.79%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PLTR's 134.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2.07%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
85.19%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 73.48%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-14.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -23.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-46.72%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
21.32%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PLTR's 48.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-26.09%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -13.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-123.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-64.75%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 55.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-643.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
35.90%
Issuance growth of 35.90% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -3.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.