PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.88%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 50.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.89%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-278.06%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.19%
Negative yoy SBC while PLTR is 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1.12%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-365.56%
AR is negative yoy while PLTR is 78.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-20.33%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
86.82%
AP growth well above PLTR's 15.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
62.24%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PLTR's 134.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-5.50%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.36%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 73.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-15.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -23.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
88.73%
Acquisition growth of 88.73% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 48.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-7.95%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -13.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-83.71%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 55.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
97.22%
Debt repayment growth of 97.22% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
8.81%
Issuance growth of 8.81% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.67%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.