PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.67%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 50.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.25%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -1.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-32.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.12%
SBC growth well above PLTR's 2.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
44.37%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 259.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
154.85%
AR growth well above PLTR's 78.85%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-101.41%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-529.29%
Negative yoy AP while PLTR is 15.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
22.45%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PLTR's 134.63%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-8.63%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -1863.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
69.39%
Operating cash flow growth similar to PLTR's 73.48%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while PLTR is negative at -23.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
96.76%
Acquisition growth of 96.76% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
6.11%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PLTR's 48.88%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-28.42%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -13.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-200.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
58.03%
Investing outflow well above PLTR's 55.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
94.88%
Debt repayment growth of 94.88% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
36.64%
Issuance growth of 36.64% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
42.71%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -3.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.