PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.09%
Some net income increase while PLTR is negative at -103.51%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.81%
D&A growth well above PLTR's 12.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.08%
Well above PLTR's 138.08% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.18%
Less SBC growth vs. PLTR's 136.29%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-298.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PLTR is 114.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-141.66%
AR is negative yoy while PLTR is 89.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
242.42%
Inventory growth well above PLTR's 133.06%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
98.72%
AP growth well above PLTR's 114.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
79.10%
Growth well above PLTR's 114.82%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-1945.45%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -180.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.71%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 121.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.73%
Negative yoy CapEx while PLTR is 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
82.68%
Acquisition growth of 82.68% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
18.72%
Purchases growth of 18.72% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-34.80%
We reduce yoy sales while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-216.42%
We reduce yoy other investing while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-239.86%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 11.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.28%
Debt repayment growth of 99.28% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.20%
Negative yoy issuance while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-5.99%
We cut yoy buybacks while PLTR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.