PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.70%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PLTR at -672.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.65%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLTR at -38.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
206.68%
Well above PLTR's 87.57% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.15%
Negative yoy SBC while PLTR is 562.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.21%
Slight usage while PLTR is negative at -236.18%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.20%
AR growth while PLTR is negative at -983.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-77.35%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 144.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
7900.00%
A yoy AP increase while PLTR is negative at -2.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
104.88%
Some yoy usage while PLTR is negative at -460.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
125.62%
Well above PLTR's 102.54%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
63.90%
Some CFO growth while PLTR is negative at -185.43%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-6.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while PLTR is 47.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-311.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.31%
Purchases growth of 16.31% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
20.83%
Liquidation growth of 20.83% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
272.00%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.84%
We have mild expansions while PLTR is negative at -59.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16566.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
46.15%
Issuance growth of 46.15% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-35.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.