PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.02%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PLTR's 16.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-24.51%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLTR at -9.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
92.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PLTR's 228.28%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
7.93%
SBC growth while PLTR is negative at -19.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-47.87%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PLTR is 123.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
194.53%
AR growth well above PLTR's 5.49%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-221.91%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 138.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-89.59%
Negative yoy AP while PLTR is 100.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-172.94%
Negative yoy usage while PLTR is 109.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-62.03%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -80.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.55%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PLTR's 739.11%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-3.44%
Negative yoy CapEx while PLTR is 85.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
70.85%
Acquisition spending well above PLTR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
22.77%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PLTR's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-24.36%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-67.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20.37%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 85.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.29%
We slightly raise equity while PLTR is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-16.44%
We cut yoy buybacks while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.