PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.04%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 26.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.34%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -35.78%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-417.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 135.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PLTR at -20.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
139.11%
Well above PLTR's 95.59% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
107.24%
AR growth well above PLTR's 177.49%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-141.75%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 47.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2424.24%
A yoy AP increase while PLTR is negative at -192.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
151.29%
Some yoy usage while PLTR is negative at -379.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
0.85%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PLTR's 123.29%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
77.21%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PLTR's 343.05%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-21.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -671.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1710.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-21.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
18.13%
Liquidation growth of 18.13% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
22.32%
Growth of 22.32% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-480.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -30693.97%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
84.62%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of PLTR's 100.00%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
31.13%
We slightly raise equity while PLTR is negative at -73.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-6.04%
We cut yoy buybacks while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.