PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.48%
Some net income increase while PLTR is negative at -52.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.90%
D&A growth well above PLTR's 25.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.36%
Some yoy growth while PLTR is negative at -82090.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.02%
SBC growth while PLTR is negative at -9.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-33.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLTR at -996.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-4102.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PLTR at -128.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-17.93%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PLTR at -24.81%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
94.12%
Lower AP growth vs. PLTR's 521.48%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
538.20%
Some yoy usage while PLTR is negative at -33.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-18.52%
Negative yoy while PLTR is 7406.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.39%
Some CFO growth while PLTR is negative at -7.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -8.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.33%
Acquisition growth of 93.33% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.04%
Purchases well above PLTR's 14.66%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-49.54%
We reduce yoy sales while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
8.50%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PLTR's 98.56%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-12.07%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 15.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
13.64%
We slightly raise equity while PLTR is negative at -584.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-3.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.