PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.87%
Some net income increase while PLTR is negative at -42.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-29.88%
Negative yoy D&A while PLTR is 12.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-520.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.76%
SBC growth while PLTR is negative at -11.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
27.16%
Less working capital growth vs. PLTR's 150.98%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
192.84%
AR growth while PLTR is negative at -100.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-17.79%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-158.93%
Both negative yoy AP, with PLTR at -171.68%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-125.20%
Negative yoy usage while PLTR is 157.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-139.22%
Negative yoy while PLTR is 143.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-5.81%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 137.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.56%
CapEx growth well above PLTR's 3.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
72.37%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. PLTR's 2223.31%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-1.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
110.06%
Below 50% of PLTR's 6679.56%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
24.43%
We have some outflow growth while PLTR is negative at -2123163.01%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
67.81%
We have mild expansions while PLTR is negative at -2227.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.73%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. PLTR's 85.42%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
36.36%
Buyback growth of 36.36% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.