PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.89%
Negative net income growth while PLTR stands at 27.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
51.98%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -4.53%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-199.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.80%
SBC growth well above PLTR's 12.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-525.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLTR at -20.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PLTR at -44.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
391.88%
Inventory growth of 391.88% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-307.66%
Negative yoy AP while PLTR is 24.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
32.42%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. PLTR's 136.62%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1314.29%
Well above PLTR's 23.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-38.35%
Negative yoy CFO while PLTR is 11.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.84%
Some CapEx rise while PLTR is negative at -8.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-5383.05%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
49.67%
Purchases well above PLTR's 58.44%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-72.68%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLTR at -49.21%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
237.17%
Growth well above PLTR's 99.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-14399.20%
We reduce yoy invests while PLTR stands at 70.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-94.40%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-61.90%
Negative yoy issuance while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.20%
We have some buyback growth while PLTR is negative at -96.66%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.