PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.32%
Net income growth under 50% of PLTR's 11.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.14%
D&A growth well above PLTR's 0.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
22.27%
Deferred tax of 22.27% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-4.42%
Negative yoy SBC while PLTR is 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
124.49%
Well above PLTR's 158.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
31.28%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. PLTR's 269.08%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-82.36%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
125.70%
A yoy AP increase while PLTR is negative at -254.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
157.79%
Some yoy usage while PLTR is negative at -2606.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
7943.43%
Some yoy increase while PLTR is negative at -87.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
69.29%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PLTR's 191.13%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-12.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -38.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.58%
Acquisition growth of 97.58% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
48.73%
Some yoy expansion while PLTR is negative at -212.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-7.98%
We reduce yoy sales while PLTR is 245.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-195.10%
We reduce yoy other investing while PLTR is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
85.12%
We have mild expansions while PLTR is negative at -115.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-210.25%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-5.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -6.78%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.