PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.94%
Net income growth under 50% of PLTR's 182.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.72%
Some D&A expansion while PLTR is negative at -5.48%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-25.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.04%
SBC growth while PLTR is negative at -44.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLTR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
205.97%
AR growth while PLTR is negative at -234.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-778.18%
Negative yoy inventory while PLTR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-121.79%
Negative yoy AP while PLTR is 184.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-173.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLTR at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.51%
Both negative yoy, with PLTR at -625.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PLTR at -32.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-7.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -99.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-37.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLTR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
42.78%
Purchases well above PLTR's 13.78%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
14.64%
We have some liquidation growth while PLTR is negative at -86.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-139.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -1757.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLTR at -317.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
52.09%
Debt repayment growth of 52.09% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
32.21%
Issuance growth of 32.21% while PLTR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
2.45%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of PLTR's 3.23%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.