PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.63%
Negative net income growth while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
4.05%
D&A growth of 4.05% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
601.49%
Deferred tax growth of 601.49% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-12.01%
SBC declines yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-17.51%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-280.76%
AR shrinks yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
626.00%
Inventory growth of 626.00% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
406.14%
AP growth of 406.14% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
56.17%
Growth of 56.17% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
59.93%
Under 50% of Software - Infrastructure median of 10.00% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-19.98%
Negative CFO growth while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
16.96%
CapEx growth of 16.96% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-526.19%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
50.09%
Purchases growth of 50.09% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-27.47%
We liquidate less yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-209.97%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
61.91%
Investing flow of 61.91% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-249.86%
We reduce issuance yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-0.68%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.