503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.14%
Net income growth of 29.14% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
6.51%
D&A growth under 50% of Software - Infrastructure median of 0.80%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
4.32%
Deferred tax growth of 4.32% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-2.01%
SBC declines yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-38.50%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-150.97%
AR shrinks yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
321.53%
Inventory growth of 321.53% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
120.79%
AP growth of 120.79% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
40.20%
Growth of 40.20% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-5.46%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-48.05%
Negative CFO growth while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-16.22%
CapEx declines yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-1881.56%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
20.42%
Purchases growth of 20.42% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
1.98%
Proceeds growth of 1.98% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
164.85%
Growth of 164.85% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
39.05%
Investing flow of 39.05% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-219.87%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-43.98%
We reduce issuance yoy while Software - Infrastructure median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
25.73%
Buyback growth of 25.73% while Software - Infrastructure median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.