PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.79%
Net income growth of 11.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
47.64%
D&A growth under 50% of Technology median of 0.92%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.34%
Working capital of 187.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.36%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2000.00%
Growth of 2000.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.60%
CFO growth of 25.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-12.27%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-370.54%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Growth of 83.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-24.33%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.32%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-59.35%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.